dan

Guerneville Dump

In the space under the house, I had the load all ready to go–trash bags stuffed with debris I’ve removed from the beach over the past year, a sizable stack of cheap inner tubes and other floaties, some of which needed a stroke from the machete to fully deflate, a couple of old TVs, and a bat of insulation left by the previous owner that got soaked in last winter’s flood.

With a little shoving, it all fit in the back of the pickup, and I rolled out toward Guerneville’s transfer station.

Which is in an odd location–it’s out on the windiest, narrowest section of the Pocket Canyon Highway (SR 116) between Guerneville and Forestville. Then, a turn at a sign that says (simply and somewhat inaccurately) “Refuse Disposal Area.” Then up a steep, windy 1-lane path, much like the ones I’m used to navigating by bicycle. Then around the edge of a forested subdivision, and into a clearing.

Having arrived, I had a fine experience–friendly staff, free recycling for the TVs, only $15 to dump the trash, and then I was quickly on my way back down the steep path, except that I had to back up quite a ways and fit into somebody’s driveway to let an incoming garbage truck pass.

However. What an odd, un-economic, and un-ecological location for a transfer station. I didn’t get to see one of the big semitrailers head fully loaded down the path, and I’m not sure I’d want to.

There are  a lot of undeveloped flat sites along, or close to, the main road through the Guerneville area. Some of those sites are unrecovered from the area’s legacy of foresting. Some are even publicly owned.

Certainly, over the years, the powers that be must have considered relocating the transfer station to one or more of these safer, more accessible sites. They must have taken into account the reduction in vehicle emissions from haulers and residents. The increased safety. The opportunity to move the facility away from a residential area and to restore the current site, which I’m guessing is an old landfill.

And I’m guessing they also took into account NIMBY opposition to any new site, and the potential for lawsuits and delays, and the limits on their powers of eminent domain.

The crippling of government power–which is synonymous with the undermining of democracy–has left our society unable to make sensible decisions that can improve quality of life and enhance environmental value.

That aside, I’m really going to enjoy future trips to the transfer station. It’s beautiful up there.

Frontier Justice?

I was riding past the theater in downtown Guerneville, eastbound on the final leg back to Forestville. I heard a screech of tires and a thump, and then a louder thump, and breaking glass. And then I saw him, in front of the green Volvo, writhing on the pavement. He was screaming in agony.

I stopped the bike, pulled my phone out of my jersey, and dialed 911. As the phone connected, a white Dodge sedan with front end damage pulled across the intersection and parked next to where I was standing, headed the wrong way. At the same time, the injured man got to his feet and staggered across the intersection toward me, then collapsed at the curb. A woman went to comfort him. I told the 911 operator a car had hit a pedestrian, who was seriously injured. I stayed on the line for a few minutes until a fire engine pulled up. People were out of their cars, gathering around.

The firefighters were unhurried, professional, as they got the duffel bag out the compartment and put on latex gloves. Something told me I ought to hang around. For one thing, the man was dark-skinned, and his clothes old and worn. His English was thickly accented. He was agitated and fearful. And seemed, in that moment, so very alone.

The firefighters examined his head and neck, and at the same time, tried to get him on to a stretcher. He was resisting, begging them not to hurt him.

While we waited for the ambulance and the Sheriff—it was more than 20 minutes—this fellow in an orange cap shows up. He knew the woman driving the Dodge sedan, and he checked that she was OK. She was smoking a cigarette, rather shakily. Then he went over to the injured man, now bound to the stretcher, and mocked him a bit. “We’ll come see you in the hospital,” he sneered.

By this time, I’ve heard snippets of bystanders’ conversations, and I’m starting to put the pieces together. The injured man wasn’t a pedestrian, he was driving a motorcycle, which had smashed into the other side of the Volvo. But why?

The guy in the orange cap said the motorcycle had just been stolen from in front of his shop.

The woman in the white Dodge may or may not have been chasing him, and may or may not have brought her car into contact with the motorcycle. He may have tried to cut the corner to speed across the bridge on 116, as the Volvo pulled forward into the intersection. He wasn’t wearing a helmet.

I heard the injured man tell the EMT he was Punjabi, so I headed over to a local Punjabi-owned store to pass on the news. I figured he might have local family that needed to know. I told the clerk what I’d seen and a little of what I’d overheard. She said she had no idea who he might be, but would keep an ear out.

As I rode back through the intersection, on my way home, the driver was putting the ambulance in gear. I stopped for a look at the motorcycle and then pedaled home.

SB 231

I’m watching and listening to a webinar with State Senator Robert Hertzberg on SB 231. The law, recently signed Governor Brown, creates an opening for municipalities to fund their stormwater programs with a fee similar to those charged for water or sanitary sewer service–if they can link the newly funded programs to a benefit for the water or sanitary sewer utility. The purpose and tone of the webinar is to caution municipalities against adopting fees that will bring lawsuits, already threatened, from the Howard-Jarvis Taxpayer’s Association.

I’m glad, of course, for the appearance of any potential path to funding needed municipal services, particularly stormwater pollution prevention, where I do most of my work.

However, the law and Hertzberg’s cautions about using it validate the concerns I had more than two years ago.

To expand on those concerns: Surface runoff isn’t just about water supply, it’s a key ingredient of the natural environment–and of urban quality of life. Everything we’re doing now with Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development is not about getting water back into our homes and businesses, it’s about preserving and enhancing watersheds. So this emphasis on stormwater capture and use, well, it’s miles away from what Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act is all about.

It’s also a very Southern California thing, to regard the natural environment as a stage and a resource for serving urban development, rather than nestling human habitation amidst nature, which is our northern Californian ethos.

With due respect and appreciation for Senator Hertzberg and Governor Brown, I think that–for the agencies I work for–this effort has been more negative than positive. I’d rather that we find a path to funding stormwater that is based on the higher principle, and better argument, that when it comes to the water cycle, “When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.”

About the fires

This week I’ve traveled through Santa Rosa repeatedly, on my way between the Bay Area and Forestville. I’ve seen the fires and the devastation, and I’ve been breathing the smoke. We’re now almost six days into the disaster, and the shock is wearing off, so it’s time for lessons learned (or woulda-coulda-shoulda, if you prefer).

  1. Consider urban vs. rural-residential issues separately. I don’t have much to say about rural and rural-residential fires, because they are all-too-frequent, and the issues and (partial) solutions are out there. Urban wildfires are way less frequent, but more devastating.
  2. The fires themselves are a natural phenomenon. Land development and climate change may affect the timing or trigger specific occurrences, but these places have always burned. When the Santa Ana winds blow, any spark can become an explosive conflagration.
  3. I don’t think there is any way to make a single-family house or single-family neighborhood safe or survivable in a fire whipped by 50 mph winds. We should all accept the risk of property loss and instead focus on getting people out of harm’s way when the time comes.
  4. I think most of the blazes were sparked by PG&E lines that were torn apart or knocked down by the wind. Totally preventable. A scandal, really. It is ridiculous and unconscionable that, in California’s disaster-prone environment, electrical lines haven’t been undergrounded in all urban areas, and that aerial lines in rural areas haven’t been upgraded.
  5. The warning and evacuation systems were inadequate. What would work? Pole-mounted loudspeakers and lights that could be activated instantaneously and remotely. This could be implemented throughout urban areas, starting with the ones that are most obviously vulnerable.
  6. People who live in vulnerable areas should have an app that alerts them when Santa Ana conditions are forecast, and the app should tell them to sleep with the phone on and the sound up pending an evacuation alert.
  7. Most people who died were 75+ and/or had limited mobility. Maybe at least a registry so first responders can prioritize during an evacuation?
  8. Immediately after the 1991 Oakland fire, there was talk of rebuilding the neighborhoods differently—at least widening the roads where people died in traffic jams. Almost none of these potential changes were implemented. There is a lot of opportunity to upgrade and consolidate land-use intensity in the burned-over areas of Santa Rosa and Larkfield/Wikiup, but it is unlikely to happen.
  9. Common thread: Vulnerability to disaster is part of the cost of the weakening of our government. This includes budget cuts, poor land-use planning, and restrictions on eminent domain. Progressive people need to sharpen their position on supporting government, including reasonable control over property rights and private decision-making. Some things need to be decided collectively, via democracy, rather than individually, or we all pay the price.

Quick Turn Around

“What a weekend,” I said, as the six of us wheeled into the Fremont BART station. We’d bicycled 133 miles, starting from Colma BART, with an overnight in Santa Cruz, and a lot of meals and hanging out.

That was at 4 PM. On the hour-long BART ride to El Cerrito, I booked the late train to Sacramento, where I’m attending a conference in the morning.

Community

As I usually do on Wednesday nights, I picked up a little before I vacuumed and mopped the common areas. I like to leave things clean for the girls.

Then I packed my overnight bag and my work satchel. It was late, and the house was quiet. I couldn’t help making some noise opening and closing the garage door, and then the Mini Cooper was rolling through the familiar nightime streets that lead to the freeway and the bridge.

I set the cruise control and made myself relax. In an hour, I’d arrived at the river house and was on my way to bed.

The river behind the house.

In the morning, I got straight to work. About 5:30 pm, my project done and sent off to the client, I went down the stairs to check how the river was doing.

Returning, I stopped to dig, idly, at the roots of some English ivy that’s clambering up the redwoods at the corner of the house.

That’s when I realized I wasn’t alone.

I don’t know why the two young men were hanging out in the backyard, a little on my side of the line, standing in the bushes. I didn’t really care. The neighbors’ house is full of activity, and I purposefully give little mind to the comings and goings. I don’t bother them, they don’t bother me, except for the cars and trucks and travel trailers parked everywhere in and around the lot. And the derilect washing machines waiting to be taken to the dump. And the occasional explosion. And the loud knocking every weekday morning at 5:00.

Live and let live, I say.

We exchanged greetings, though the bushes, without really being able to see each other.

“How you doin’ man?”

“Good, how are you?”

I went back inside and took that hot shower I’d been wanting all day. I put on a sweater and started out on my 20-minute stroll to the pub.

It’s a nice walk–only a little of it is on the shoulder of busy River Road, and part of it goes through a County beach park. And you can look down at the river from the historic Hacienda Bridge (an unusual camelback truss, built in 1914).

When I got to the pub, the bartendress asked if I wanted my usual pint, and I looked around for a table.

And there were my two young neighbors.

I sat at the table next to them, as it was the only one open. We exchanged small talk about canoeing the river–where to put in and take out, and how you can canoe down to the Blues Festival and watch the acts from the river without having to pay.

I thought it was nice that they knew the bartendress. After a while she stopped by their table to say she was ready to check out what they had, and they all went out into the parking lot to do some business.

When they returned, my neighbors’ take-out order was ready.

Me, I ordered another beer and watched the Giants get beat by a run, and then walked back up the road in the dark.

 

Smite the Music

Ever cringed at an annoying noise that just goes on and on? Ever wished some Act of God would occur to silence it–suddenly and decisively?

When I arrived at the river house, last night around 11:30, there was a party going on next door.

My neighbors seem like perfectly nice people. When I arrived at a similar time, just a few weeks ago, and found the street in  front of our houses flooded, one of these folks got in a canoe and came over to paddle me across. Another time, their two girls came over to introduce themselves to Zoe.

Still, they park in front of my garage door, blocking me out (or in). There’s a trailer parked in the driveway between our houses, and the occupants cut a hole in the roof of it to install a wood stove, and it belches clouds of smoke.

And then there’s the noise. TVs on loud after midnight, and again before 6 AM. Occasional shouting and carrying on.

Last night it was heavy metal rock music. It didn’t bother me for the hour after I arrived, while I unwound with a whiskey and read the paper in the living room. But when I got into bed, I heard it plenty loud. Enough to keep me up. It was still going at 12:30. At 1:00.

I got up and found my bluetooth earbuds. I downloaded a white noise app, and listened to a canned rainstorm, hissing over the thump, thump, thump, of the bass.

About 1:30, I took out the earbuds and tried sleeping with my head between two pillows. I was, in fact, dozing fitfully when a mighty explosion shook the bed.

And then all was blissfully silent. I looked over to see what time this blessed event had occurred, and the bedside clock was dark.

As was the rest of the house.

What the hell. I listened for screams, and hearing none, gratefully dozed off until the first of their cars, many of which lack mufflers, roared to life about 5:15.

In the morning, I lit the gas stove manually. I took my cup of coffee and strolled down the block to where workers were cutting up a mighty bay laurel which had fallen across the road–and the power line.

A Norman Rockwell moment

I left Santa Barbara about 6:00 pm. I was a bit tired after three days on the road. There had been an interagency meeting in the morning, and then I lead a 3-hour training workshop in the afternoon.

About an hour into the 6-hour drive home, feeling hungry, I stopped at an In-n-Out Burger in Santa Maria. Santa Maria is an ag-and-oil town, sprawling and charmless.

I skipped the drive-through lane, and instead parked up and walked inside to order, still in my business suit. A high-school wrestling team had got in ahead of me.

As I found my place in line, the coach appeared and told the kids to stand aside and let me through to the front. I thanked him in my public voice and headed to the counter, happy to act a part in his lesson to the kids.

I’m not that well-traveled, but there’s something about this experience that struck me as very American–perhaps it was the way the coach was so well-mannered and so informal at the same time, demonstrating grace and consideration that transcended mere rules. I’d like to think he would have done the same for anyone.

 

 

MLK Day

King’s most famous quote, in his most famous speech, was an audacious, in-your-face challenge to white people.

“I have a dream,” he said, “that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

The message is uplifting, yes, and is also laced with righteous anger, bitterness, and sarcasm. “I have dream,” indeed.

The reaction to that message still reverberates. Today, after a half-century of advances and setbacks, King’s challenge to white people is as stark as in 1963.

At the August 28, 1963 March on Washington

The 2016 presidential campaign was all about character. About being consistently poised and respectful, despite differences. About answering difficult questions directly and honestly. About doing your homework and knowing what you’re talking about. About listening and remaining persuadable in the heat of argument. About being protective of those who need protection. About speaking one’s mind, and standing up for what is right.

Those elements of character were the core appeal of the Democratic candidate—much more than mere ideology.

And it was a turn-off for many voters. For many white voters, that is.

Here’s what I’ve learned from being white: The existence of white supremacy, with the very real advantages if confers in status and opportunity—constitutes a moral hazard. Because it is all too easy to substitute white privilege for the very difficult effort of cultivating good character.

And the less one has accomplished through real effort and real accomplishment, rather than skating by on white skin, the greater the hazard.

The moral hazard of white supremacy can lead people to stay in economically hopeless backwaters rather than face the rigors of urban life. To stick with fading livelihoods rather than learning something new. To substitute the falsity of homilies and heritage for authentic development of one’s individuality. Enough years of this avoidance will, almost inevitably, cause a whole community to suffer hopelessness, which can be measured in rising substance abuse and mortality.

Many will also suffer anger, and resentment, against “elites” who live in a multiracial, diverse, challenging, and forward-looking world. And they may feel they are being judged and excluded for lacking the elements of character that are, more and more, indispensable currency in that world—urbane poise, open-mindedness, sensitivity to others, attentiveness to knowledge. (These elements of character are often derided as “political correctness.”)

Part of Trump’s appeal is that he offers a comforting reassurance to white people that, in America today, those “elite” character values can still be sidestepped. All you need is white skin and money, and you can be coarse, ignorant, racist, and successful. Without the money, you’re still OK.

So, Dr. King’s dream that his children (and ours) should be judged by the content of their character—that is still a dream. As we continue to pursue it, we would do well to remember that it is not just a “dream” in the sense of a high-minded aspiration, but a dream full of righteous anger at white supremacy.

Private Property

The fog burned off in the late morning, and by 3pm it was sunny and in the upper 50s. I decided on an hour’s walk around the neighborhood.

I tried McPeak Road. On the map, it starts just the other side of the Hacienda Bridge and winds up Hobson Creek.

I was aiming for some late-afternoon sunshine, but I didn’t get that. The creek is in a fairly deep canyon and it was wet and gloomy in there, although the creek was roaring and burbling, still high from the past week’s rains.

I was also hoping for some woodsy peace, but I didn’t get that either.  There was a profusion of “No Trespassing” and “Keep Out” signs everywhere, and those always put me on edge. Like I’m feeling these folks don’t want outsiders walking up their road.

Even though it’s a public road.

I walked on, deciding that those signs were referring to the land on either side of the road, even though they were kind of aimed to be seen by someone coming up the road, like me. As I walked further up the canyon, I passed the last of the reasonably well-kept houses, and pretty soon I was traversing what seemed to be someone’s personal garbage dump, with disused recyclables and rusted equipment scattered all the way across a yard, to the edge of the road, and then piled on the other side of the road, leaving only a narrow passage to get through.

Soon after I came to what looked like a standard county gate, something that would be installed by a public agency, except that it had a “keep out” sign right behind it. So I kept out, and walked back down the road toward home.

There wasn’t any sign that said “end of county maintained road.” Since I’ve been living part-time in Sonoma County I’ve noticed instances where someone had staked out a portion of the public right-of-way (between their fence line and the pavement edge, for instance) for their private use. So I’m left wondering where McPeak Road ends, and if the public right of way continues beyond that gate, and whether I’m curious enough to go look at official county maps and records to find out.

And I’m also shaking my head at the decrepitude of these properties, here in the midst of a lot of wealth and a critical lack of housing.